论文部分内容阅读
后期维特根斯坦在批判其前期逻辑图像论的基础上,提出了语言游戏论,主张从语言游戏中确定词语的意义,对意义的本真追问成为其哲学研究的母题;韩礼德作为功能语言学派的创始人,继承了普罗塔哥拉和柏拉图为代表的语言观,将语言学视为人类学和文化的一部分,韩礼德的功能语言学思想也强调语言在具体语境中的使用和功能,认为语言可以建构现实。从意义观、语境观、研究对象、研究目标等方面系统比较维特根斯坦语言游戏论与韩礼德功能语言学思想的异同,并探寻导致其差异的根源,对于当下的语言哲学研究具有重要的理论价值。
Later Wittgenstein put forward the theory of language games based on the critique of his early logical image theory, advocating the definition of the meaning of words from the language games and the questioning of the true meaning as the motif of his philosophical studies. Halliday as a functional language school Inherited the linguistic view represented by Protagoras and Plato and regarded linguistics as part of anthropology and culture. Halliday’s functional linguistics also emphasizes the use and function of language in specific contexts, and holds that Language can construct reality. To systematically compare the similarities and differences between Wittgenstein’s game theory of language and Halliday’s functional linguistics from the perspectives of meaning, context, object of study and research objectives, and to explore the root causes of the differences, the important theory for the contemporary study of language philosophy value.