论文部分内容阅读
这个春季,围绕“维纳斯计划”的论争似乎盖过了柳条抽芽和玉兰花开的声音。不经意间望向窗外,才发觉埋首追踪“维纳斯”时,已错过了整个早春。这次采访遭遇了众多媒体选题的空前大撞车,与诸位同行频频擦肩接踵之际,未免平添一丝浮躁。而抬头远望的豁然开朗及时地提示我们:无论传媒还是企业,都需要有放眼量风物的宽阔视野。因为,全球化已无可阻挡地成为这个时代最重要的特征。 公允地说,“维纳斯计划”只是也只能是一次商业行为。我们无意在有关“维纳斯”的各种细节上争扯不休分出是非高下,也无意就单纯的上下游、民族产业之争来讨论,“维纳斯”成功与否最终还要由“沉默的大多数”——老百姓手中的钱包来决定。我们关注的是“维纳斯”事件所昭示出的客观事实和发展趋势:80年代开始引起人们注意的经济全球化浪潮到90年代显现出更鲜明的表征,并将在下个世纪席卷全球;全球化趋势无情地影响着中国的经济发展乃至历史进程,无论承认与否,作为国际社会的积极成员,开放的中国将不可回避地成为世界经济链条中的一环。 基于这样的宏观背景,“维纳斯”之争才意味深长。“维纳斯”之前,跨国企业对中国企业客观上造成的冲击已不乏实例。“维纳斯”之后,相信这种冲击还将长时间大范围地持续。在别的产业领域,也许“X?
This spring, the controversy surrounding the “Venus plan” seems to have overshadowed the sound of wicker buds and magnolia blossoms. Inadvertently looking out of the window, he discovered that he had missed the entire early spring when he buried “Venus”. This interview suffered an unprecedented crash of many media topics, and it was an impetuous occasion to meet with your colleagues. The sudden and eagerly looking forward to promptly remind us that both the media and the enterprise need to have a wide field of vision. Because globalization has become an indispensable feature of this era. It is fair to say that the “Venus Plan” can only be a commercial act. We have no intention of arguing over the various details of “Venus”, nor do we intend to discuss the issues of purely upstream and downstream and national industrial disputes. Ultimately, the success of “Venus” must be determined by “The majority of silence” - the purse in the hands of ordinary people. We are concerned with the objective facts and trends that are clearly shown by the Venus incident: the wave of economic globalization that began to attract attention in the 1980s has become more distinctive in the 1990s and will sweep the globe in the next century; The trend of relentlessly affects China’s economic development and even historical progress. Whether or not it recognizes it, as an active member of the international community, an open China will inevitably become part of the world economic chain. Based on such a macroscopic background, the “Venus” dispute is meaningful. Prior to “Venus”, there have been many examples of the objective impact of multinational corporations on Chinese companies. After Venus, I believe that this kind of impact will continue for a long time. In other industries, maybe "X?