论文部分内容阅读
“使用外挂代练”不同于“制作、出售、运营外挂”:前者是后者的下游行为;根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,前者属于“故意避开技术措施”的行为,而根据司法解释,后者系出版非法出版物的行为。“使用外挂代练”包含“使用外挂”与“代练”两层含义。代练本身并不违法,使用外挂不是非法出版。不能直接以社会危害性的判断取代犯罪构成符合性的判断。不明确的刑法规定是不合理的,对不明确的刑法规定进行无限的扩大解释更不合理。“使用外桂代练”与非法经营罪的行为类型相去甚远。以非法经营罪惩罚外挂代练行为严重违反了罪刑法定原则。
“The use of plug-in generation training ” is different from “production, sale, operation plug-in ”: The former is the latter’s downstream behavior; According to the “Regulations on Protection of the Right to Propagation of Information Network”, the former belongs to “deliberately avoid technical measures” According to the judicial interpretation, the latter is the publication of illegal publications. “Use plug-in generation training ” contains “use plug-in ” and “training ” two meanings. Diligence itself is not illegal, the use of plug-in is not illegal. Social justice can not be directly replaced by judgments of crime constitutes a conformity. It is unreasonable for the ambiguous provisions of criminal law to make an infinite expansion of ambiguous provisions of criminal law. “The use of foreign Gui Dai Lian ” far from the type of conduct of illegal business crime. Penalties for illegal business practices outside the chain practice seriously violated the principle of legality.