论文部分内容阅读
反垄断法损害赔偿制度作为反垄断法的重要救济制度,对受害方的权利救济起着至关重要的作用。但由于我国反垄断法是实际损害赔偿制度,并不能起到诉讼激励作用,从而使得受害方成为了权利上的懒惰者,甚至是权利上的睡眠者。本文从法律经济学角度对反垄断法损害赔偿制度进行了深入分析,并对美国三倍损害赔偿制度与德国判决前利息制度进行了法律经济学评析,从而本文建议,我国应采取“三倍惩罚性赔偿”和“判决前利息制度”相结合的损害赔偿标准制度。
Antitrust damage compensation system as an antitrust law, the important relief system plays an important role in the victim’s right relief. However, because our country’s antitrust law is the actual system of damages, it can not play the role of lawsuit incentive, making the victim a lazy person on the right and even a right-sleeper. This essay analyzes the damage compensation system of antitrust law from the perspective of law and economics, and makes a legal and economic analysis of the triple damages system in the United States and the pre-judgment interest system in Germany. Therefore, this paper suggests that China should adopt “triple Punitive damages ”and“ pre-judgment interest system ”a combination of standard system of damages.