论文部分内容阅读
针对文艺非意识形态化现象,陆梅林在今年第二期《文艺研究》上撰文,提出该如何理解“意识形态”的概念。文章的第三部分首先具体地辨析了近三四十年在我国颇为流行的对“意识形态”的界说,即:①阶级社会产物说;②直接反映说;③二分说。谈到“阶级社会产物说”时,文章认为“不仅整个意识形态一般地具有阶级性,而是意识形态的各种形式也都是有阶级性”。但仅对“把意识形态诸种形式是有阶级性的观点简单化和庸俗化”,认为在意识形态的诸形式中,有的“阶级性强烈”,有的“不那么明显”,有的“甚至很难说与阶级有关。”谈到“直接反映说”时,认为这种观点“可以概括某
In response to the phenomenon of non-ideological literature and art, Lu Meilin wrote an article on “Literary and Art Studies” in the second issue of this year and proposed how to understand the concept of “ideology.” The third part of the article first specifically analyzes the very popular definition of “ideology” in our country in the past three or four decades, namely: ① class social product theory; ② direct reflection; ③ dichotomy. When it comes to the “theory of class social goods,” the article holds that “not only does the entire ideology generally have class, but ideological forms are also class.” However, it is only “simplifying and vulgarizing the idea that there are classifications in various forms of ideology,” and that among the various forms of ideology some are “strongly class”, some are “less obvious” and some are even “ It is hard to say that it is related to the class. ”When it comes to“ direct reflection ”, we think that this view can be summarized