论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨传统手术与腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术的临床差异，并对其安全性作出分析。方法：选取2012年6月～2014年6月的子宫切除术患者110例，观察组：腹腔内镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)65例；对照组：传统开腹子宫全切术（TAH)45例，比较两组的临床差异。结果：数据表明，两组手术时间基本同步，P>0.05；而观察组在临床指标如：术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院观察期明显优于对照组，且术后并发症明显少于对照组，P＜0.05；当然观察组的治疗费用也显著高于对照组，P＜0.05。结论：LAVH操作安全、临床疗效确切，并发症少，对机体的损害减少，适于临床推广。“,”Objective To investigate the clinical differences between the traditional operation and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and to make an analysis of its safety.Methods 110cases of patients with hysterectomy from June 2012 to June -2014, the observation group: 55cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LAVH), cases in control group, 110cases were compared between the two groups.Results the data showed that the operation time of the two groups was basically synchronous,P>0.05, and the observation group was significantly better than the control group, and the postoperative complications were significantly less than the control group,P <0.05, and the observation group was significantly higher than the control group,P< 0.05.Conclusion LAVH is safe and effective, with less complications and less damage to the body. It is suitable for clinical application.