论文部分内容阅读
在流通体制改革中,怎样对待“红头文件”,是不少同志所关心的。有的同志认为,改革就得凭红头文件,没有红头文件不能干,改错了谁负责?为了“等待”红头文件,有的单位干脆按兵不动,或者把改革停下来,据说这样比较“保险”。这种态度值得研究。红头文件,传达的是党和国家关于体制改革的意见或者指示,是十分重要的。但是红头文件又是从哪里来的?我认为,从根本上说,它来之于实践。关于农村改革的文件,就来之于农村改革的实践(这种实践,不只是近几年,建国以来的历史上早就有过)。它不是实践的简单记录,而是实践的总结和提高。实践在先,文件形成在后,而不是相反。不以实践为基础的红头文件,必
In the reform of the circulation system, how to deal with “red tape” is what many comrades are concerned about. Some comrades think that reform must be based on the red tape and no red tape on the paper. Who is responsible for correcting mistakes? Some units are said to be “insured” in order to “wait for” red tape, and others simply stop at the reform or stop the reform. This attitude is worth studying. The red tape, which conveys the opinions and instructions of the party and state on the reform of the system, is very important. But where did the red tape come from? In my opinion, fundamentally, it came to practice. The document on rural reform comes from the practice of rural reform (not just in the history of the past few years since the founding of the People’s Republic) but also in rural areas. It is not a simple record of practice, but the practice summary and improvement. Practice first, the document formed in the post, not the opposite. The red-headed document that is not based on practice must be