论文部分内容阅读
30—40年代国家与市场关系的研究大都偏重于国家对市场的控制,而市场对国家的反制重视不够。这一时期福建侨批业与国家邮局的关系虽然是由邮局主导,但也显示了侨批业对邮局的反制与制约。因此,已有结论并不全面,这与国家——市场理论对转型中的国家能力关注不够有关,应将其纳入研究范围,才能得出较全面的结论。
Most of the studies on the relationship between the state and the market in the 30s and 40s lays particular emphasis on the control of the market by the state, while the market’s countervailing on the state lays bare emphasis on it. Although the relationship between the overseas Chinese businesses in Fujian and the State Post Office during this period was dominated by the post office, it also showed the countervailing and restriction on post offices by overseas Chinese businesses. Therefore, the existing conclusion is not comprehensive, which is not related to the fact that state-market theory has not paid sufficient attention to the national capabilities in the transition. It should be included in the scope of the study before a more comprehensive conclusion can be drawn.