论文部分内容阅读
报载,国家拨给某单位抽真空技术研究经费35万元,而该单位仅花4.9万元买了设备,余下的钱除盖房外,还留作它用。在财政开支上,类似这样专款不专用的现象是屡见不鲜的。在财政开支上,多少年来形成一个习惯,就是“以拨代报”。至于这个钱是否花到该花的项目上,花钱办事的效果怎样,财政部门过问不够。有的财政部门甚至认为,我们就是管拨款的,事情办得怎样是用款单位的事。有些财政部门也想管钱问事,但往往半途而废,一是苦无评估花钱办事效果的尺子,二是常常遇到阻力,得不到花钱单位的支持和协作。财政部门放松监督,必然要出现漏洞,给国家财产带来严
According to the newspaper, the state allocated 350,000 yuan for the vacuum technology research and development of a certain unit, while the unit only spent 49,000 yuan to buy the equipment. The remaining money was for its use except for housing. In the financial expenditure, similar to this special non-exclusive phenomenon is not uncommon. In terms of financial expenditure, how many years have it taken to form a habit of “dialing a newspaper?” As for whether this money is spent on the flower project, what is the effect of spending money and the financial department has not asked enough? Some financial departments even think that we are in charge of allocating funds. Some financial departments also want to ask questions about money, but they often give up halfway. One is that they have no means of assessing the effectiveness of spending money on work. The other is that they often encounter resistance and do not receive the support and cooperation of the spending agencies. The relaxation of supervision by the financial sector inevitably requires loopholes and brings serious consequences to the state property