论文部分内容阅读
2015年5月4日,北京市海淀区和丰台区法院,分别通知《国企》杂志社研究部原主任、曾是空军飞行员的郭松民和商务部研究员梅新育,决定于5月12日和13日,分别在海淀区和丰台区法院开庭审理《炎黄春秋》两名前执行主编洪振快、黄钟起诉案。沉寂近一年的案子重新开庭,再度成为舆论关注的热点。源清智库舆情监测数据显示,围绕着对洪、黄起诉爱国学者郭、梅一事的评价,舆论迅速分化为“批评派”与“力挺派”。在传统媒体、新闻网站及微信公众号中,“批评派”优势明显,约占九成;力挺洪、黄的舆论主
On May 4, 2015, Haidian District, Beijing and Fengtai District Court informed the former director of the Research Department of State-owned Enterprises Magazine that Guo Songmin, a former Air Force pilot, and Mei Xinyu, a researcher from the Ministry of Commerce, respectively, decided on May 12 and 13 Day, respectively, in Haidian District and Fengtai District Court hearing “Yanhuang Chunqiu” two former executive editor Hong Zhenkai, Huang Zhong prosecution. Nearly a year of silence case re-trial, once again become the focus of public opinion. Source Qingzhi Library public opinion monitoring data show that, around the Hung, Huang prosecution patriotic scholar Guo, Mei evaluation of the issue, the public opinion quickly divided into “criticism ” and “strong support ”. In the traditional media, news websites and WeChat public account numbers, the “criticism” has obvious advantages, accounting for about 90% of the total;