论文部分内容阅读
近年来一些学者怀疑肥达氏反应对伤寒类疾病的诊断价值,而多数人则肯定它的临床意义。为了研究这个问题,我们于1985年安顺市暴发流行伤寒期间进行了肥达氏试验,现报告于后。对象和方法一、对象:在我院1985年9月—1986年5月收治的伤寒患者中,选出资料完整、符合诊断标准(血或大便培养检出伤寒杆菌或/和肥达氏反应“O”和“H”在1:160(+)以上者)的692例,与本院(近2月内未生病,发烧和未作过伤寒疫苗预防注射的)健康职工232例及中小学学生154例,抽血作肥达氏反应。其中本院职工作为与病人密切接触者,中小学学生视为易感人群。
In recent years, some scholars suspect Widal response to the diagnosis of typhoid diseases, while the majority of people confirm its clinical significance. In order to study this issue, we conducted a Widal’s test during the outbreak of typhoid epidemic in Anshun City in 1985, and the report is later. Subjects and methods A, object: In our hospital from September 1985 to May 1986 typhoid patients, selected data integrity, consistent with the diagnostic criteria (blood or stool culture detected Salmonella typhi or / and Widal reaction " 692 cases with O (O) and H (above 1: 160 (+)) and 232 healthy workers and primary and secondary school students in our hospital who had not been sick, had fever and had not been vaccinated against typhoid fever in the past two months 154 cases, blood for Widal reaction. One of our hospital staff as close contact with patients, primary and secondary students as a susceptible population.