论文部分内容阅读
袁恩桢、顾光青同志在《社会主义商品理论的几个问题》一文中主张,从所有制出发去寻找全民所有制经济内部产生商品经济的原因。我认为,作者这种观点很值得商榷。在这个问题上,我认为卓炯的商品经济社会分工说,完全能够说清楚社会主义商品经济存在的原因。卓炯在1985年重申了其在六十年代就提出的观点:“我就得出了一个结论:社会分工决定商品生产的存亡,而所有制则决定商品生产的社会性质和特点。”可是,袁恩桢等同志的这篇文章,却曲解了卓炯的观点,说“在卓炯自己的论述中,已经涉及到一系列从社会分工到商品生产间的中间环节,如不同的生产资料所有制、经济核算制等。”他那个单一社会分工论,恐怕还难以说清社会主义商品经济存在的原因。”作者引用了卓炯《我也谈谈社会主义的商品制度》一文中的一段话作论据。但是下面的话被漏引了,而这是卓炯的结论,原话
In his article “Several Problems of Socialist Commodity Theory,” Comrade Yuan Enzhen and Gu Guangqing advocated starting from ownership to find out the reason for creating a commodity economy within the ownership of the whole people. In my opinion, the author's view is very debatable. In this issue, I think Zhuo Jiong's division of labor and economy in commodities economy can fully explain clearly the reasons why the socialist commodity economy exists. Zhuo Jiong reiterated his point made in the 1960s: “I came to the conclusion that the division of labor in society determines the survival of commodity production, and that ownership determines the social nature and characteristics of commodity production.” However, Yuan Enzheng Comrade Zhuo Jiong's article misinterprets Zhuo Jiong's view that “in Zhuo Jiong's own account, it has already involved a series of intermediate links from social division of labor to commodity production, such as the different ownership of the means of production, System, etc. ”His single division of labor theory may not be able to explain the existence of the socialist commodity economy. The author cites a passage in Zhuo Jiong's article “I'll Talk about Socialist Commodity System.” However, the following words were cited as missing, and this is Zhuo Jiong's conclusion.