论文部分内容阅读
现行《商标法实施条例》第六十二条中规定:申请人撤回商标评审申请的,不得以相同的事实和理由再次提出评审申请。商标评审委员会对商标评审申请已经作出裁定或者决定的,任何人不得以相同的事实和理由再次提出评审申请。上述规定实际上构成了商标评审案件中“一事不再理”原则所应涵盖的两方面内容,即评审请求的系属效力及在先评审请求的既判力。正如权威人士解释并指出,并非所有类型商
Article 62 of the current Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law stipulates: Where an applicant withdraws an application for trademark examination and determination, it shall not submit an application for review again on the same facts and reasons. Where a Trademark Review and Adjudication Board has already rendered a ruling or decision on an application for trademark examination and determination, no person shall submit another application for review on the same facts and reasons. The above provisions actually constitute two aspects that should be covered by the principle of “one thing is no longer reasonable” in the trademark review and adjudication case, namely, the effect of the adjudication of the adjudication request and the res judicata of the prior adjudication request. As authorities explain and point out, not all types of business