论文部分内容阅读
1941年张季鸾去世后,王芸生任总编辑的《大公报》与国民党政府冲突不断。这篇文章在两代知识分子的光谱上比较了张季鸾与王芸生对传统的态度、政治倾向、个性与文风。两人虽然对传统儒家文化态度迥异,但都深受文人论政观念的影响,并在政治倾向上有些距离,张季鸾中间偏右,王芸生中间。张季鸾个性文风温和,王芸生激烈极端。张季鸾与蒋介石以及国民党政府一些要人有很好的私人关系,这些私人关系对《大公报》的发展以及保持集权政府下的独立地位大有助益。但王芸生甚至胡政之却没有这样的圈子。张季鸾去世之后,《大公报》调整办报方针,从拥护政府、拥护领袖到检讨自己、批评内政,王芸生一直以来被压抑的愤怒释放出来,开始“自我检讨,鞭策内政”。加上1941年以后,国民党政府腐败加深,社会经济状况日劣,双方冲突就更加激烈了。
After the death of Zhang Jizhen in 1941, the conflict between King Kong’s chief editor and the Kuomintang government continued. This article compares the traditional attitudes, political tendencies, individuality and style of writing written by Zhang JIYUAN and WANG YUN-SENG on the spectrum of intellectuals of the two generations. Although they hold different attitudes toward the traditional Confucian culture, they both are influenced by the literati’s conception of politics and politics and have some distance in their political orientation. Among them, Zhang Jianyuan is center-right and Wang Yansheng is middle. Zhang Ji 鸾 gentle personality style, Wang Yansheng intense extreme. Zhang Jiatong had very good personal relations with Chiang Kai-shek and some important people in the Kuomintang government. These private relations greatly contributed to the development of Ta Kung Pao and the independence under the centralized government. However, Wang Yusheng even Hu Zhengzhi did not have such a circle. After Zhang Jiju died, “Ta Kung Pao” adjusted its approach to running newspapers and announced that from starting to uphold the government and adhering to the leadership to reviewing itself and criticizing the interior, Wang Yun-sheng has been released from repressed anger and began to “self-criticize and spur internal affairs.” Coupled with the deepening corruption in Kuomintang government and the deteriorating social and economic conditions after 1941, the clashes between the two sides have become even more intense.