论文部分内容阅读
把哈姆雷特和福斯塔夫放在一起比较并不是一个新鲜的思想。所有真正的悲剧人物,只消一转身,便能全然成一个喜剧人物。而哈姆雷特如此深地触到悲剧的边缘,以至于事实上离喜剧也真就只是一纸之隔。陈佩斯曾经在南京大学开过一个讲座,核心的主题为:《哈姆雷特》是一出喜剧。他说,你们看看这样一个王子,号称剑术无双,随便动几下就出汗了。也许根本都是装的,这只是一个浪荡的花花公子,哪有什么报仇的能力?把所有严肃的意义加在一个根本扶不起的阿斗身上,正是喜剧的创作方式之
It is not a fresh idea to compare Hamlet with Falstaff. All real tragedy, just turn around, can become a complete comedy figure. Hamlet, on the other hand, touched the edge of the tragedy so deeply that in fact it was just a piece of paper separated from comedy. Chen Peisi had a lecture at Nanjing University, the core theme: “Hamlet” is a comedy. He said that you look at such a prince, known as the unrivaled sword, just a few sweat. Perhaps it is all installed, this is just a swirling playboy, what can be the ability to take revenge? All serious significance added to a basic body can not afford to do, it is the way comedy creation