论文部分内容阅读
在未经保证人同意的情况下,主合同当事人擅自变更合同,有关保证责任承担的问题一直存在争议。最高法院关于《担保法》解释与《担保法》对此的规定存在明显的冲突,导致不同法院法官因依据的不同从而对同种案件作出不同的判决。此文从法律解释原则和有关合同理论出发,并结合具体案例,阐述了《担保法》解释第30条的冲突之处,以期为完善担保立法提供参考。
In the absence of the guarantor’s consent, the main contract parties to change the contract without authorization, the issue of commitment to guarantee responsibility has been controversial. There is a clear conflict between the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Guarantee Law and the provisions of the Guarantee Law, which lead to different judgments of different court judges on the basis of different bases. Based on the principle of legal interpretation and the theory of contract, and combining with specific cases, this article expounds the conflict of Article 30 of “Security Law”, in order to provide reference for perfecting the legislation of guarantee.