论文部分内容阅读
了解我国学术期刊实施开放存取(Open Access,OA)的现状。以2008年版《中国期刊引证报告》(扩刊版)(CJCR)中所载的6082种期刊为调查对象,将每种期刊全称手工输入到Googel搜索引擎,查找并分析已经实施开放存取期刊(OAJournals,OAJ)的详细信息。OAJ总量为757种,包括中文版OAJ 730种,英文版OAJ 24种,几乎涵盖了所有学科。实施OA途径包括期刊独立OA、依托商业网、依托学科信息网、依托主办单位、多刊联合OA;主办单位包括高校、科研机构、学术团体、政府机构、出版机构及其他;分布在大陆所有省市自治区;以双月刊最多,半年刊最少;其中中文核心期刊356种,20种英文版OAJ被SC I收录;期刊类别与实施OA途径有关;回溯时间最早的为1933年;OA时滞段以<6个月最多,以12~24个月最少,并且发现OA时滞与OA途径有关;OA期数最多的期刊是《物理学报》;OA全文的格式及数量以PDF最多,以PDF+W ord两种格式并存最少,OA文献格式与实施OA途径有关。目前,中国的OAJ数量已初具规模,但OAJ的学科、地区分布不均,多呈现“信息孤岛”状态;OA资源丰富的OAJ,其OA途径以期刊独立OA为主。
Understand the status quo of implementing Open Access (OA) in academic journals in our country. Taking the 6,882 periodicals contained in the CJCR 2008 edition as the survey subjects, the full name of each periodical was manually input to the Googel search engine to find and analyze the periodicals that have implemented the open access periodicals OAJournals, OAJ) for more information. The total number of OAJs is 757, including 730 Chinese versions of OAJ and 24 English versions of OAJ, covering almost all disciplines. The implementation of OA channels include independent journal OA, relying on commercial network, relying on the discipline information network, relying on the organizers, multi-magazine joint OA; organizers include universities, research institutions, academic groups, government agencies, publishing agencies and others; all provinces in mainland China Municipalities and autonomous regions; bimonthly most, semi-annual minimum; of which 356 kinds of Chinese core journals, 20 kinds of English version of the OAJ SCI included; journals category and the implementation of OA-related; trace back the earliest time in 1933; OA lag to < 6 months, 12 months to 24 months minimum, and found that OA lag and OA pathway; OA most periodicals is the Journal of Physics; OA full text format and quantity to PDF up to PDF + W ord The two formats coexist with the least, OA document format and the implementation of OA-related. At present, the number of OAJs in China has begun to take shape, but the academic and regional distributions of OAJs are unevenly distributed. Most of them have the status of “isolated islands of information”. OA-rich OAJs mainly focus on the OA of periodicals.