论文部分内容阅读
摘要目的研究3个不同工作站生成的冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分是否具有可比性,从而得到独立于厂商的结果。材料与方法本研究获得伦理审查委员会和放射防护联盟的批准,每例病人均签署了知情同意书。
Abstract AIM To study whether coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores generated by three different workstations are comparable and to obtain vendor independent results. Materials and Methods The study was approved by the Ethics Review Board and the Radiation Protection Coalition and each patient signed an informed consent form.