论文部分内容阅读
在编年体断代史中,东晋袁宏《后汉纪》历来受到较高的评价。唐代史评家刘知几在《史通·正史篇》里说:“世言中兴,作史者唯袁、范二家。以配蔚宗,要非溢美也。”清代编撰的《四库提要》说:“其体例虽仿荀悦书,而悦书因班固旧文剪裁联络,此书则抉择去取自出鉴裁,抑又难于悦矣。”的确,在写作的宗旨、史料的搜集及撰写的体例等诸多方面,《后汉纪》不仅可与荀悦《前汉纪》媲美,而且具有范晔《后汉书》所不能取代的长处。但是,在近千年来的古籍
In chronological chronological history, Eastern Jin Dynasty Yuan Hong “Han Dynasty” has always been a high rating. Liu Zhiji, a historian of the Tang Dynasty, said in his article entitled “Shi Tong Zheng Shi Pian”: “The reincarnation of Shi Yan, the only historian of Yuan Dynasty and Fan Erjia. ”The Siku Tribune“ said: ”Although its style is similar to that of Xun Yuet-shu, Yue-yu is cut for contact with the classics in the old class and the book is chosen to be derived from the ruling and restrain it.“ Indeed, Purpose, collection of historical materials and writing style and many other aspects, ”Later Han Dynasty“ not only comparable with Xun Yue ”Former Han Dynasty“, but also with Fan Ye ”Later Han" can not be replaced by the strengths. However, ancient books in nearly a thousand years