论文部分内容阅读
在重点反思实在论范式和价值论范式不足的基础上,文章提出实践论范式应成为当代图书馆学研究的范式选择。实在论范式强调客观的抽象本质,意义成为先于理解的存在,个性差异因不符合规律而遭到贬损和否定,从而也抑制了人的主观能动性,图书馆工作成为模具化的麻木的物化过程。价值论范式消解了规律,但也解构了意义的确定性,导致个体意识的张扬和共性原则的缺失,直接造成图书馆学的混乱和无序。实践论范式的哲学基础是马克思主义实践哲学,它把人类文化交往活动视为图书馆的宏大背景,关注每一个“我”的具体图书馆实践,同时又强调客体对象和他者主体对“我”的规约。由此,知识真理成为依附于特定实践对象和社会关系的存在,从而实现了对实在论范式和价值论范式的双重颠覆。
On the basis of focusing on the reflection of the deficiency of the realism paradigm and the value paradigm, the article proposes that the paradigm of practice should become the paradigm choice of the contemporary research of library science. The realism paradigm emphasizes the objective abstraction essence, the meaning becomes the existence prior to comprehension, and the personality difference is derogatory and negative due to the non-compliance with the law, which also inhibits the subjective initiative of people and the library work becomes the materialized process of numbness . The paradigm of value theory eliminates the law, but also deconstructs the certainty of meaning, which leads to the spread of individual consciousness and the lack of common principle, which directly causes the confusion and disorder of library science. The philosophical foundation of the paradigm of practice is the Marxist practical philosophy. It regards the activities of human cultural exchanges as the grand background of the library, pays attention to the actual library practice of each and every individual, and emphasizes on “I ” of the statute. As a result, the knowledge truth becomes dependent on the existence of specific practice objects and social relations, thus realizing the double subversion of the realism paradigm and the value paradigm.