论文部分内容阅读
目的对比LEEP刀(低温超高频电波刀)与微波治疗女性巨大尖锐湿疣的疗效。方法回顾性分析LEEP刀与微波治疗女性巨大尖锐湿疣的资料,比较两组的疗效。结果切除疣体后随诊8个月,LEEP刀组一次性临床治愈率为78.79%,微波组为53.12%,LEEP刀组一次性临床治愈率较微波组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LEEP刀组平均临床治愈时间为(20.79±7.79)d,微波组为(27.75±10.49)d,LEEP刀组较微波组平均临床治愈时间短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LEEP刀组复发率为9.09%,微波组为12.50%,两组复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论治疗女性巨大尖锐湿疣,LEEP刀较微波一次性临床治愈率高,平均临床治愈时间短,优于微波。
Objective To compare the curative effect of LEEP knife (cryogenic ultra-high frequency wave knife) and microwave treatment of female genital warts. Methods The data of LEEP knife and microwave treatment of giant condyloma acuminatum were retrospectively analyzed. The curative effect of the two groups was compared. Results Eight months after the removal of wart, the one-time clinical cure rate was 78.79% in LEEP group and 53.12% in microwave group, and the one-time clinical cure rate in LEEP group was significantly higher than that in microwave group (P < 0.05). The average clinical cure time was (20.79 ± 7.79) d in LEEP knife group and (27.75 ± 10.49) d in microwave group, and the average clinical cure time was shorter in LEEP knife group than in microwave group (P <0.05) ; LEEP knife group recurrence rate was 9.09%, microwave group was 12.50%, the recurrence rate was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of giant genital warts in women, LEEP knife microwave one-time clinical cure rate, the average clinical cure time is shorter, better than microwave.