论文部分内容阅读
现在环境设计某种程度上仍延续着孟福德的思路:“一进入宫殿,就有风雅之感;一进入教堂,就有虔诚的心情;一踏进大学,就有学术气氛;在办公室,则感到事务性和有效率性。”原因在于它符合社会成员一般的认识和情感取向。这一行动脚本的意义在于,它蕴藏着人类文化中能够正确或成功生活的各种行为模式。其根本的隐喻——受社会文化制约的目标和为社会行为提供秩序化的纲领——表明它关心的乃是个人与社会的完整与和谐这一主题。 以此为开端很容易走进建筑人类学设置的公共祭祀的环境陷井。这是其获得强势地位的方式决定的。一种共同的取向必定有一种“排除结构”的过滤作用来保证,因而不同于孟氏训导的认识和取向被合法地排除掉了。这是M·福柯对认识和权力互为基础的质疑。
At present, the design of the environment still continues the idea of Monforte to some extent: “Upon entering the palace, there is a feeling of elegance; as soon as entering the church, there is a pious feeling; as soon as I enter a university, I have an academic atmosphere; in the office, I feel Transactional and efficient. ”The reason is that it is in line with the general awareness and emotional orientation of members of society. The significance of this action script lies in the fact that it contains all kinds of patterns of behavior in human culture that can be correctly or successfully managed. Its fundamental metaphor - the target of social and cultural constraints and the program of order for social behavior - shows that it is concerned with the theme of personal and social integrity and harmony. As a starting point, it is easy to walk into the environmental trap of public worship set up by architectural anthropology. This is how it has gained its power. A common orientation must have a filtering effect of “excluding structure” so that knowledge and orientation different from that taught by Monteggia are legally excluded. This is M Foucault’s quest for mutual understanding and power.