论文部分内容阅读
《行政许可法》对行政许可及实施主体等作了明确规定,但是,在实施行政许可过程中,不少人存在一些错误认识。本文拟从一起案例谈谈对行政许可性质及主体权限的再认识。案件的基本情况2003年底,四川某县出现了一起试图强制拍卖已合法取得行政许可的某私营民用爆破器材经营权的案例。刘某接收一家经营民爆器材破产企业的经销物资后,在政府未投入任何资金的情况下,于2002年初与另外两人共同出资30万元在当地工商机关注册登记了经营民爆器材的私营企业,并按照国家对民爆器材经营企业
The “Administrative Permission Law” clearly stipulates the administrative licensing and the implementation subject, however, many people have some misunderstandings in the process of implementing administrative licensing. This article intends to talk about the nature of the administrative license and the re-understanding of the main authority from a case. Basic facts of the case At the end of 2003, a case occurred in a county in Sichuan that attempted to force the auction of the rights to operate a private civilian blasting machinery that had legally obtained administrative permission. After receiving the distribution materials of a bankrupt enterprise operating in Explosives and without any funds from the government, Liu initially invested 300,000 yuan with the other two in the private sector of the local commercial and industrial establishments in early 2002 Enterprises, and in accordance with the state of civil explosive equipment business