论文部分内容阅读
现在,我们对于诗歌的批评遭遇到一种方法的困窘,它不是意指着方法的贫乏,而是方法的泛滥和无所适从。譬如,我们采用后结构主义的方法,可以进入语言文字,对它的符号示义程式进行解析;我们采用新批评的方法,可以轻视经验的“个性化”,进入社会的文化的普遍性阐释;我们采用历史主义的批评方法,诗便成为社会关怀神话的一项内容。但是,什么是诗人写作之初的诗情,诗歌文本成立后的诗性的意义又怎样,逼近诗与真的是什么样的状态……,这些都令人不得要领。
Now that our critique of poetry is embarrassed by a method, it does not mean impoverishment of methods, but proliferation of methods and loss of experience. For example, we adopt the method of post-structuralism to enter the language and to analyze its symbolic definition program. With the new method of criticism, we can underestimate the “personality” of experience and explain the universal culture of the society. With the criticism of the historicist approach, poetry has become a part of the myth of social concern. However, what is the poet’s writing at the beginning of the poetic, poetic text after the founding of the poetic meaning of what, approaching the poem and really what kind of state ... ... These are incredible essentials.