论文部分内容阅读
权利作为法理学的一个重要且复杂的研究对象,不同时期的不同法学家各自对权利做出了不同的定义。拉兹作为当代西方最具影响力的法学家之一,他的权利利益论推进了世界权利理论的发展。在国内,张文显所提出的以要素综合说为基础的“权利本位论”成为通说。因此,本文通过比较分析的研究方法对拉兹与张文显的权利概念进行比较,探析两者之间的异同,以期进一步完善学界对权利的定义。
As an important and complex subject of jurisprudence, rights are defined by different legal scholars of different periods. As one of the most influential jurists in the contemporary West, Raz has promoted the development of the theory of rights in the world. In China, Zhang Wenxian put forward the theory of elements based on the comprehensive theory of “rights based on” became a general rule. Therefore, this article compares the concept of rights of Razz and Zhang Wenxian through the comparative analysis of the research methods to explore the similarities and differences between the two, in order to further improve the academic definition of rights.