论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨传统腹股沟疝修补术与无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的临床疗效。方法将我院2014年01月至2016年09月收治的78例腹股沟直疝、斜疝的患者，根据患者的就医要求分为观察组62例和对照组16例，对照组采用传统的腹股沟疝修补术，观察组采用平片或充填式无张力疝修补术，比较两组患者的手术时间、术后自由活动时间、并发症的发生率及术后复发率。结果观察组的手术时间、术后自由活动时间、并发症的发生率及术后复发率均显著优于对照组，p<0.05。结论无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的临床效果良好，值得推广应用。“,”Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of traditional inguinal hernia repair and tension-free hernioplasty for inguinal hernia. Methods 78 cases of inguinal hernia, hernia in our hospital from January 2014 to September 2016 months were selected, According to the requirements of the patients were divided into observation group 62 cases and control group of 16 cases, In the control group, conventional inguinal hernia repair was used, and the observation group was repaired with plain film or fil ing tension free hernia repair, The operation time, free time, incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results the operation time, free time, incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group, p<0.05. Conclusion the clinical effect of tension-free hernioplasty for inguinal hernia is good, it is worthy of popularization and application.