论文部分内容阅读
目的探究腹腔镜和开腹手术在治疗宫外孕的临床实践过程中实际治疗效果差异。方法选取收治的宫外孕患者共计136例为研究对象,随机对患者进行分组,分成腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组,每组患者均为68例,分别采用腔镜手术和开腹手术。观察并比较两组研究对象实施不同手术治疗方法的手术时间、出血量、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间和输卵管畅通情况。结果 1在手术时间、手术中出血量、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间等指标上,组间比较,腹腔镜手术组患者的各项指标均明显的优于开服手术组。且组间数据差异具有显著的统计学意义。结论采用腹腔镜手术方法的临床效果显著,是治疗宫外孕的理想可靠选择。
Objective To explore the difference between the actual treatment effect of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the clinical practice of ectopic pregnancy. Methods A total of 136 patients with ectopic pregnancy who were treated were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into laparoscopic group and open group, 68 patients in each group were treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy respectively. The duration of operation, bleeding volume, anal exhaust time, ambulation time, hospital stay and tubal unobstructed condition were observed and compared between two groups. Results 1 The indexes of laparoscopic surgery group were significantly better than those of open surgery group in the operation time, bleeding volume during operation, exhaust time of anus, time to bed activity and hospital stay. And the data difference between groups has significant statistical significance. Conclusion The clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery is significant and is an ideal and reliable choice for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.