论文部分内容阅读
合法行为是最常见的用来评价法律行为的法学术语,以往法学界对此缺乏深入研究。本文从剖析合法行为的判断标准、判断者和判断机制入手,对合法行为的定义及其在法理学中的意义进行了较为系统的阐述。作者指出,合法行为的定义应是:由行为者自身、他人和法律评价机关将实际中已经存在或正在发生的、由行为者主观意志支配的动作行为,同法律规范所确定的行为模式之间,在时空区域内方向、顺序和界限方面进行相互比较后,而得的一致性逻辑判断。
Legitimate behavior is the most common legal terminology used to evaluate legal behavior. In the past, the legal community lacks deep research on this. This article starts with the analysis of the judgment criteria, judgments and judgment mechanisms of legal acts, and makes a systematic exposition of the definition of legal acts and their significance in jurisprudence. The author points out that the definition of legal act should be: the actor himself, others and the law evaluation agencies will actually exist or are taking place, the subjective will of the actors at the domination of the act of action with the legal norms set by the behavior of the model , In the space-time regional direction, order and boundaries for mutual comparison, the resulting logical consistency judgment.