论文部分内容阅读
在行政审判实践中往往遇到这样的问题:被告许诺改变具体行政行为,原告撤回起诉,但等案件终结之后,被告行政机关又不改变行政行为,那么人民法院应该采取什么措施对该行政执法机关进行制约呢?这在行政诉讼法上没有规定,司法解释上更无明确解答。为了更好地促使被告行政机关在原告撤诉之后完成善后工作,笔者认为应该进行延伸监督。 所谓延伸监督,就是在行政诉讼中,在被告许诺改变具体行政行为、人民法院准予原告撤回起诉后,被告采取不作为的手段,不改变其具体行政行为时,人民法院实行跟踪监督的具体措施。
In the administrative trial practice often encountered such problems: the defendant promised to change the specific administrative act, the plaintiff to withdraw the prosecution, but after the end of the case, the defendant administrative body does not change the administrative act, then the people’s court should take what measures to the administrative law enforcement agencies What is the restriction? This is not stipulated in the Administrative Procedure Law, and there is no clear solution to the judicial interpretation. In order to better urge the defendant’s administrative organ to complete the aftermath of the plaintiff’s dismissal, the author believes that it should be extended. The so-called extension of supervision is that in administrative proceedings, the people’s court shall follow the concrete measures of tracking and supervision when the defendant promises to change the specific administrative act, the people’s court shall allow the plaintiff to withdraw the prosecution and the defendant adopts the omission to change the specific administrative act.