论文部分内容阅读
在现代编辑活动中,作为编校原则之一的“多就少改”一语时常被人挂在嘴边,其意泛指多遵从原文,而不轻于臆改,这就为一些怠于编校的编辑者提供了借口。书稿如经他们之手,往往是囫囵吞枣、草草一过,等而下者甚至未待寓目即告编毕校罄,即使鲁鱼弥望亦漫不经心。另一方面,逞臆增删修改的好事者颇喜对书稿施以手段,甚者几乎到了偏执的程度,完全不尊重书稿的作者和原貌,结果弄巧成拙,乌焉成马。细究起来,这两种极端均与编校者对“多就少改”的误用有关——前者是对这一原则不负责任的滥用,后者则是对它的反动——均需要我们在编校工作中尽量避免和努力克服。
In modern editing activities, one of the principles of editing and editing has often been talked about, which refers to how much to follow the original text rather than to make changes, Editors at the editors provided an excuse. If the manuscripts through their hand, often swaddling, cursory, and so on, and the next is not even the headline that is compiled and finished school, even though Lu Yu Mi Wang also careless. On the other hand, those who took the liberty to add or delete were quite pleased with the manuscripts, which almost reached the level of paranoid. They did not respect the authors and the original appearance of the manuscripts at all and the results were self-defeating. Looking closely, both of these extremes are related to the editors’ misuse of “more and less” - the former is an irresponsible abuse of this principle and the latter is a reaction to it - both require We try to avoid and try to overcome in the editing work.