论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过分析中文版流畅体验量表(FSS)的心理测量学特征来探讨该量表在中国的适用性。方法:对随机抽取的1206名大学生被试进行问卷调查,并对问卷调查结果进行分析。结果:9个分量表的高分组和低分组的得分在0.01水平上差异均显著,各题项与对应分量表之间相关在0.50～0.81之间;分量表的内部一致性系数在0.79～0.85之间,总量表的内部一致性系数为0.93,折半信度为0.88,重测信度为0.82;各分量表之间相关在0.23～0.57之间,分量表与总量表之间相关在0.60～0.85之间,各相关在0.01水平上均显著;探索性因素分析提取的9个因子的累积方差解释率为68.58%,验证性因素分析显示,各项拟合指标良好。结论:中文版流畅体验量表(FSS)具有良好的信度和效度,值得推广试用。
Objective: To explore the applicability of this scale in China by analyzing the psychometric features of the Chinese version of the Fluency Experience Scale (FSS). Methods: A total of 1206 undergraduates were randomly selected from the questionnaires, and the results of the questionnaire were analyzed. Results: The scores of high scores and low scores of 9 subscales were significantly different at 0.01 level. The correlations between each item and the corresponding subscales ranged from 0.50 to 0.81. The internal consistency coefficients of subscales ranged from 0.79 to 0.85 , The internal consistency coefficient of the total scale is 0.93, the degree of half reliability is 0.88, the test-retest reliability is 0.82; the correlation between the subscales is between 0.23 and 0.57, the correlation between subscales and the total scale is 0.60 ~ 0.85, and all the correlations were significant at 0.01 level. The cumulative variance explained by nine factors extracted by exploratory factor analysis was 68.58%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the fitting indicators were good. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Fluency Experience Scale (FSS) has good reliability and validity and is worth promoting.