论文部分内容阅读
行政规定虽不具备法的形式,但以其“规范性”的实质在行政机关作出具体行政行为的过程中发挥着重要的作用。在行政审判中,法院就具体行政行为合法性进行审查时,不可避免的要对相关行政规定是否适用作出判断。本文从司法审查的角度,对行政规定予以分类,提出行政规定的合法性、合理性审查的标准,并认为在个案中,应根据不同类别的行政规定,对其效力以及据此作出的具体行政行为的约束力,予以认定。
Although administrative regulations do not have the form of law, they play an important role in the process of making specific administrative actions by administrative organs in the essence of their “normative ”. In the administrative trial, when the court examines the legitimacy of a specific administrative act, it is inevitable to make judgments as to the suitability of the relevant administrative provisions. This article, from the perspective of judicial review, classifies the administrative regulations and puts forward the criteria for the legality and rationality of the administrative regulations. It also considers that in individual cases, the effectiveness of the administrative rules and the specific administrative arrangements accordingly should be based on the different categories of administrative provisions Binding behavior, to be identified.