论文部分内容阅读
僭主在学术界没有一个好的名声,其往往与暴君、篡位者通用,原因不仅在于这些名词所包含内容特点之间的相似,以及僭主专制权力与当今的自由民主观念相违背,对于僭主政治的合法性以及特殊的政治地位研究的空乏也应负一定责任。僭主政治即僭主执政时期的政治形态,在古希腊时期僭主政治虽然可能摧毁良好社会,但其对于古希腊城邦的政治经济文化的发展起了不可忽视的作用。而这构成了僭主上台的合法性基础,本文通过对于僭主政治产生的过程、特征、以及其合法性的论证希望读者对于僭主政治
The Lord did not have a good reputation in academia, and it was often used in common with tyrants and usurpers, not only because of the similarities and differences between the features and contents of the terms, but also because the authoritarian authority violated today’s concept of freedom and democracy, Legitimacy and the paucity of research on particular political positions also bear some responsibility. The main political form is the political form of the ruling period. In ancient Greece, the ruling state politics may destroy the good society, but it plays an irreplaceable role in the political, economic and cultural development of the ancient Greek city-states. However, this constitutes the legitimacy basis for the Lord to step onto the stage. Through the demonstration of the process, characteristics and legitimacy of the main politics, this essay hopes that readers’