论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨100例糖尿病足患者的临床治疗效果。方法此次依不同治疗方式将2015年1月—2017年1月于该院诊治的糖尿病足患者100例分组为:对照组用常规方式治疗,观察组用常规方式+前列地尔治疗;记录两组患者各项实验数据,并将所获相关数据作对比分析,探讨了糖尿病足患者的临床治疗。结果观察组(常规方式+前列地尔)治疗糖尿病足患者的疼痛消失时间、创面愈合时间优于对照组(常规方式),患者不良反应少,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论糖尿病足患者选择常规方式+前列地尔治疗的临床效果显著、不良反应少,值得临床上广泛用于治疗糖尿病足者。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of 100 patients with diabetic foot. Methods According to the different treatment methods, 100 cases of diabetic foot patients diagnosed and treated in this hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were divided into control group treated by conventional method and observation group treated by conventional method and alprostadil. Group of patients with the experimental data, and the relevant data obtained for comparative analysis of diabetic foot clinical treatment. Results The pain disappearing time, wound healing time of diabetic foot patients in observation group (conventional way + alprostadil) were better than those in control group (routine method), patients had fewer adverse reactions, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05) . Conclusion Diabetic foot patients choose conventional way + alprostadil treatment of clinical significant, less adverse reactions, it is widely used in clinical treatment of diabetic foot.