论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较腹腔镜与传统开腹术治疗直肠癌的临床效果。方法选取医院收治的直肠癌患者60例为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组30例。对照组采取传统开腹术,观察组采用腹腔镜术治疗,观察2组患者手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量及术后并发症的发生情况。结果观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.01);观察组术后并发症发生率为3.33%,低于对照组的20.00%(P<0.05)。结论与传统开腹术相比,腹腔镜术治疗直肠癌患者的并发症明显更低,其疗效更为显著,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods Totally 60 patients with rectal cancer admitted to hospital were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into control group and observation group with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated by conventional laparotomy. The observation group was treated by laparoscopy. The operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were observed in the two groups. Results The operation time and hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, with less bleeding during operation than those in the control group (P <0.01). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 3.33%, which was lower than that in the control group (20.00%, P 0.05 ). Conclusion Compared with traditional laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery for patients with rectal cancer significantly lower complication, the effect is more significant, worthy of clinical application.