论文部分内容阅读
保险箱不保险,防盗门不防盗。这些事,平日里听说过,生活中发生过,好像并不稀奇。然而,2002年11月6日,浙西衢江区法院却遇到了一起堪称奇特的官司:用户的保险箱被撬盗而状告生产厂家要求赔偿9.8万元巨款,结果厂家以赔偿5.7万元损失与用户达成调解协议。人们都说,这是盗贼将了保险箱生产厂家的军!需说明的是,该保险箱生产厂家信誉一向较好,产品销量也一直不错,当发生质量问题时,该厂能正确对待,接受处理,并表示要认真总结经验教训,努力提高产品质量。鉴于此,文中当事人及保险箱型号均予以化名。
Safe is not safe, security door is not anti-theft. These things, heard on weekdays, happened in life, it seems not unusual. However, on November 6, 2002, Qujiang District Court in western Zhejiang met with a strange lawsuit: the user’s safe was stolen and sued the manufacturer for compensation of 98,000 yuan, resulting in the manufacturer to compensate 57,000 Yuan loss and the user reached a mediation agreement. People say that this is a thief who will be the manufacturer of the safe box! Be noted that the safe manufacturer has always been good reputation, product sales have been good, when the quality problems, the plant can be treated correctly, to accept treatment, He also said that we should conscientiously sum up experiences and lessons and strive to improve product quality. In view of this, the text of the parties and safe models are to be pseudonym.