论文部分内容阅读
目的:对应用双水平无创正压通气技术对患有呼吸衰竭的新生儿实施治疗的临床效果进行研究。方法:选择本院收治的患有呼吸衰竭的新生儿88例,随机分为对照组和观察组,平均每组44例。采用常规经鼻塞持续气道正压通气技术对对照组患儿实施治疗;采用双水平无创正压通气技术对观察组患儿实施治疗。对比两组研究对象的呼吸功能指标恢复正常时间和呼吸衰竭治疗总时间、新生儿呼吸衰竭通气治疗效果、在通气治疗前后的不同时间点动脉血气分析指标的改善幅度。结果:观察组患儿呼吸功能指标恢复正常时间和呼吸衰竭治疗总时间明显短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);新生儿呼吸衰竭通气治疗效果明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);在通气治疗前后的不同时间点动脉血气分析指标的改善幅度明显大于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应用双水平无创正压通气技术对患有呼吸衰竭的新生儿实施治疗的临床效果非常明显。
Objective: To study the clinical effect of using bi-level noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on neonates with respiratory failure. Methods: Eighty-eight neonates with respiratory failure admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with an average of 44 in each group. Conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure technique was used to treat children in the control group. Two-level noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was used to treat the observation group. The resuscitation time and the total time of respiratory failure were compared between two groups. The therapeutic effect of ventilation in neonatal respiratory failure and the improvement of arterial blood gas analysis at different time points before and after ventilation were compared. Results: The resuscitation time and the total time of respiratory failure in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P <0.05). The neonatal respiratory failure ventilation was better than the control group, the difference was Statistical significance (P <0.05). The improvement of arterial blood gas analysis index at different time points before and after ventilation was significantly greater than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of using bi-level noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on neonates with respiratory failure is very obvious.