论文部分内容阅读
Mobile IP is the proposed standard for IP mobility support. When a Mobile Node (MN) is far away from home, registration at its home agent can cause a long handoff delay that leads to significant packet drop and throughput reduction. In order to improve standard mobile IP , the mobility of MN has been divided into micro mobility and macro mobility. Some micro mobility management protocols have been developed. We compare the performance between standard mobile IP (RFC2002,RFC3220,RFC3344) and micro mobility management protocols and give some equations along with the analysis of calculating results.
Mobile a is the proposed standard for IP mobility support. When a Mobile Node (MN) is far away from home, registration at its home agent can cause a long handoff delay that leads to significant packet drop and throughput reduction. We compare the performance between standard mobile IP (RFC2002, RFC3220, RFC3344) and micro mobility management protocols and give some equations along with the analysis of calculating results.