论文部分内容阅读
曾在全国各地上映的美国大片《U—571》(前译《猎杀U—571》)曾引起了人们极大的兴趣。故事的背景是1942年二战期间,德军依靠当时先进的“谜”式密码机进行军事联络,令盟军束手无策,为扭转战局,美军冒险夺取密码机,使战情得以扭转。故事情节看起来很正常,在二战期间也确有夺取德军密码机的事实,但《U—571》出来后,特别是当片尾郑重声明“影片是根据真实事件改编而成”时,英国人非常气愤,他们认为当年夺取密码机的是他们的皇家海军,而与美军没有任何联系。就连两国元首也卷入事件中,在英国下议院会议中,首相布莱尔表示“完全同意”议员谴责该片“公然侮辱当年舍生夺取密码发报机的英军”。而美国前总统克林顿在回应英国议员的书面质询时强调:“皇家海军拯救了许多性命,那是毋庸置疑的。不过电影《U—571》并不是要成为历史事件的准确描述。”那么到底事实是怎样的、谁又是真正的“猎手”呢?
U-571 (U-571), once themed in the United States, has aroused great interest in the United States. The story is the background of the story in 1942 during World War II, the German relies on the then advanced “mystery” password machine for military contact, so that the Allies helpless, to reverse the war, the U.S. military adventure to seize the password machine, the war be reversed. The plot seems normal, and indeed the fact that the German cipher machine was captured during World War II, but the “U-571” came out, especially when the end of the film solemnly declared that “the film is adapted from real events”, the British are very Angry, they think the password-grabbing machine of that year was their Royal Navy without any contact with the U.S. military. Even the heads of state of the two countries were involved in the incident. In the meeting of the British House of Commons, Prime Minister Blair said “fully agreeing” Members condemned the film as “a blatant insult to the British army who took births and took the password to send a reporter.” In response to a written question by British parliamentarians, former U.S. President Clinton stressed: “There is no doubt that the Royal Navy saved many lives, but the film” U-571 “is not intended to be an accurate account of historical events.” So what happened? What is it, who is the real “hunter”?