论文部分内容阅读
继今年第一期我们推出了“AMD和Intel你会选择谁”的主题后,有许多读者来信说明自己的观点,为此BUG特在这期再次把焦点对准这两个CPU芯片大厂,我们都知道AMD昔日率先推出了1GHz的CPU,而去年INTEL则把2GHz的P4率先带给了我们,可以说频率之争愈演愈烈,P4所特有的NetBurst架构非常有利于其主频的提升,而AMD则避开其锋芒,提出了TPI理论,并用PR值取代实际频率,这是否合理呢?大家对两个芯片大厂在这方面不同的作法有何看法呢?BUG特地请来了一些圈子中的朋友来谈谈他们的精彩见解:)
After the first issue of this year we launched the theme of “Who do you want to choose from AMD and Intel?” Many readers wrote letters to explain their own opinions. For this reason, BUG specially focused on the two CPU chip makers this time, We all know that AMD was the first to launch the 1GHz CPU in the past, while Intel introduced the 2GHz P4 to us first last year. It can be argued that the battle for frequency is fiercer. P4’s unique NetBurst architecture is very conducive to its clock speed. AMD Then avoid its edge, put forward the TPI theory, and use the PR value to replace the actual frequency, is this reasonable? Everyone on the two chip makers in this regard different practices what? BUG specially invited some circles Friends to talk about their wonderful views :)