论文部分内容阅读
编輯同志: 部分师范大学和师范学院的中文系將要廢除“現代文选及習作”这門課,或是准备廢除它。教育部对这还沒有作出决定。我認为在作决定之前需要慎重考虑。我对于廢除“現代文选”沒有什么相反的意見,但我不贊成廢除“習作”課。人們主張廢除習作課所持的理由首先是:教师为批改作業耗費时間精力很多,而收效很小,学生也感到不需要。另方面,教师們除了評改習作以外,多半能教現近文学,古典文学、苏联文学、语言学、教学法之类的課;現在大量地新建和扩大高等师范学校,哪一类的課都需要許多教师去教,取消了習作課,便可以抽出一批入去开課。另一个理由是現在習作都是大班上課,一个教室容一兩百人,而一个主講教师决不可能評改一兩百本習作,因此把評改習作分攤在別的教师(特别是助教)身上,主講教师只批改一小部分,或是全不批改。这
Editor’s Comrade: Some Chinese departments of normal universities and teachers colleges will abolish the course of “Modern Anthology and Exercises” or prepare to abolish it. Ministry of Education has not yet made a decision on this. I think we need to think twice before making a decision. I have no contrary opinion on abolishing the “modern anthology”, but I do not agree with the abolition of the “practice” class. People advocate the abolition of the reasons for the first lesson is: teachers to modify homework spent a lot of time and energy, and the effect is small, students do not feel the need. On the other hand, teachers can mostly teach classes of recent literature, classical literature, Soviet literature, linguistics and pedagogy besides reviewing their assignments. Now, a large number of classes are newly built and expanded in higher normal schools and classes Need a lot of teachers to teach, cancel the class, you can pull out a group into the class. Another reason is that most of the exercises are now conducted in large classes. One classroom has a capacity of one or two hundred. A chief teacher can never comment on one or two of the exercises. Therefore, apportioning the assessment work to other teachers (especially teaching assistants) Teachers only approved a small part of the amendment, or no amendment. This