华法林和阿司匹林治疗症状性颅内动脉狭窄的比较研究

来源 :世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:hl830320
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is an important cau se of stroke. Warfarin is commonly used in preference to aspirin for this disord er, but these therapies have not been compared in a randomized trial. METHODS: W e randomly assigned patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke caused by angiographically verified 50 to 99 percent stenosis of a major intracranial arte ry to receive warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) or as pirin (1300 mg per day) in a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. The prim ary end point was ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, or death from vascular caus es other than stroke. RESULTS: After 569 patients had undergone randomization, e nrollment was stopped because of concerns about the safety of the patients who h ad been assigned to receive warfarin. During a mean follow-up period of 1.8 yea rs, adverse events in the two groups included death (4.3 percent in the aspirin group vs. 9.7 percent in the warfarin group; hazard ratio for aspirin relative t o warfarin, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.90; P=0.02), major h emorrhage (3.2 percent vs. 8.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 per cent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.84; P=0.01), and myocardial infarction or su dden death (2.9 percent vs. 7.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95 pe rcent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.91; P=0.02). The rate of death from vascula r causes was 3.2 percent in the aspirin group and 5.9 percent in the warfarin gr oup (P=0.16); the rate of death from nonvascular causes was 1.1 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively (P=0.05). The primary end point occurred in 22.1 percent o f the patients in the aspirin group and 21.8 percent of those in the warfarin gr oup (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.48; P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin was associated with significantly higher rates of adverse events and provided no benefit over aspirin in this trial. Aspirin should be use d in preference to warfarin for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is an important cau se of stroke. Warfarin is commonly used in preference to aspirin for this disord er, but these therapies have not been compared in a randomized trial. METHODS: W e randomly assigned patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke caused by angiographically verified 50 to 99 percent stenosis of a major intracranial arte ry to receive warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) or as pirin (1300 mg per day) in a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. The prim ary end point was ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, or death from vascular caus es other than stroke. RESULTS: After 569 patients had undergone randomization, e nrollment was stopped due to concerns about the safety of the patients who h ad been assigned to receive During a mean follow-up period of 1.8 yea rs, adverse events in the two groups included death (4.3 percent in the aspirin group vs. 9.7 percent in the warfa hazard ratio for aspirin relative to warfarin, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.90; P = 0.02), major h emorrhage (3.2 percent vs. 8.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 per cent confidence interval , 0.18 to 0.84; P = 0.01), and myocardial infarction or su dden death (2.9 percent vs. 7.3 percent, hazard ratio, 0.40; 95 pe rcent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.91; death from vascula r causes was 3.2 percent in the aspirin group and 5.9 percent in the warfarin group (P = 0.16); the rate of death from nonvascular causes was 1.1 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively (P = 0.05). The primary end point occurred in 22.1 percent of the patients in the aspirin group and 21.8 percent of those in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.48; P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin was associated with significantly higher rates of adverse events and provided no benefit over aspirin in this trial. Aspirin should be use d in preference to warfarin for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.
其他文献
取代反应是一种重要的有机反应,范围广泛,不仅是教学的重点和难点,也是近几年高考的热点问题.能否真正理解和掌握取代反应的概念是学生解决实际问题的关键.笔者特撰写此文,仅供
1993~ 1 999年 ,我们对 3 2 7例维汉族的上消化道出血病人进行病因分析 ,发现维汉民族之间出血原因及部位不尽相同 ,现报告如下。1 资料与方法本组男 2 0 7例 ,女 1 2 0例 ,
石榴,原名安石榴,又名若榴、丹若和石罂等。原产伊朗和阿富汗,我国南北各地均有栽培。石榴花,为连云港市市花,亦为合肥、西安、枣庄、新乡、驻马店、黄石、十堰和荆门等市选
根据中华人民共和国商业部(55)商教字第二四号指示称:伟大的「三反」运动清算了贪污盗窃行为,纯洁了国营商业内部,经过一系列的政治学习运动,尤其是总任务,四中全会决议和宪
采访手记1948年春天,毛泽东和中共中央机关秘密抵达河北省阜平县的一个小山村城南庄,准备在这里指挥全国的解放战争。但来此不久,一天早晨,毛泽东的住所就被国民党的飞机实
现将本会关于1960年第一季度工作的安排发给你们,希认真贯彻执行。附件:关于1960年第一度季工作的安排。江西省人民委员会关于1960年第一季度工作的安排(经省人民委员会第九
温暖中山,情义樱雪,希望你们用心感受一个历经17年稳健发展,蓬勃发展,高端发展,正在转型,正在成熟,正在奔跑的樱雪集团。在中国,比樱雪大的厨卫企业很多,没有樱雪大的厨卫企
1949年秋,新中国人民空军正值筹建培训阶段。为了保卫北平和迎接中国人民政治协商会议的安全召开,阻击帝国主义反动派的挑衅行为,华北航空局奉命成立一支空军部队,由原国民
为了使每个学生在原有的学习基础上得到生动、活泼、主动的发展,小组合作学习便如雨后春笋般出现在现今的课堂教中。合作是群体成员为了实现共同的目标而同心协力,相互促进的
①找一个长方形纸盒,在中间画一个等腰三角形。  ②沿着三角形的线剪开纸盒的两边和顶部。  ③在纸盒的底端贴上双面胶,然后将纸盒从中线处对折,粘牢。  ④用纯色包装纸包好,用双面胶固定。  ⑤在纸上画出自己喜欢的图案,贴上心爱的小饰品。  ⑥把纸盒固定在书桌上,一个小笔筒做好啦。