论文部分内容阅读
春秋战国时代如何对待音乐共有两种态度:以孔子为代表的儒家学派是倡导礼乐的,认为音乐具有“安善治民,移风易俗”的社会功能。而以老于为代表的道家和以墨于为代表的墨家则相反,他们是“非乐”论者,“非乐”,就是从根本上否定音乐的作用,以致发展到要取消一切文化艺术的地步。所谓“非乐”论,并不是毫无根据的否定和指责音乐,而是以一种认真批判态度提出论据,有材料、有观点、持之有故、言之成理的审美意识。当然,历史发展的结果证明,“非乐”论是不符合客观规律的,中国音乐及一切其他艺术形式在历史岁
There are two attitudes towards music in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods: the Confucian school represented by Confucius advocated ritual music and held that the music possesses the social function of “rule the people and change the customs”. On the contrary, they are “non-music” theorists and “non-music”, that is, they fundamentally negate the role of music and develop to cancel all cultural art The point. The so-called “non-music” theory is not a baseless denial and accusation of music, but an aesthetical sense of putting forward arguments based on materialism, opinions, excuses and justification. Of course, the result of historical development proves that the theory of “non-music” does not conform to objective laws. Chinese music and all other forms of art are at the historical age