论文部分内容阅读
自从马克思主义哲学诞生以来便有许多流派对其进行阐释,较有影响力的包括恩格斯主义的阐释方法和黑格尔主义的阐释方法,其中代表后一阐释路向的西方马克思主义者卢卡奇、柯尔施等人认为“马克思直接衔接着黑格尔”。虽然这种阐释路向自上世纪90年代开始占据主导地位,但这一研究范式的弊端也日益暴露出来,因为它未能清楚地阐明马克思主义哲学中最为核心的决定论和能动论的关系问题,导致这种结果是由于黑格尔哲学自身的理论局限性,因而超越黑格尔主义的这种阐释方式是一种理论发展的需要,是对马克思主义解读的必然要求。
Since the birth of Marxist philosophy, many schools of thought have interpreted it. Some of the influential ones include Engelic interpretation and Hegelian interpretation. Among them, the later Western Marxist Lukacs, who represents the way forward, Karl Korsch and others think that “Marx directly connects with Hegel.” Although this interpretation has dominated since the 1990s, the drawbacks of this research paradigm are increasingly exposed as it fails to clearly articulate the relationship between the most central determinism and activism in Marxist philosophy, This result is due to the theoretical limitations of Hegel ’s philosophy itself. Therefore, this way of interpretation that transcends Hegelianism is a need for theoretical development and an inevitable requirement for the interpretation of Marxism.