论文部分内容阅读
以黑格尔的思维框架来理解马克思,已经在学术界日趋得到反思。目前流行的一些观念,诸如将异质性的生活与斗争还原为“二元对立”的劳动与资本、无产者与资产者的斗争,并最终得到和解,未来那种“好社会”借助“资本自否定”得以达成等观念,正是“黑格尔幽灵”的显现。当意大利自治主义者哈特、奈格里将这些问题的原因铆钉在黑格尔辩证法上时,开放马克思主义代表约翰·霍洛威则试图以阿多诺的否定辩证法介入这场讨论,他分析了黑格尔辩证法是我们思维的“紧身衣”及其所导致的实践偏离,重提阿多诺的“非同一性”的政治哲学意义,并倡导从资本的生产力到“劳动的社会生产力”的转型,以此去寻求资本主义批判与解放的可能。
To understand Marx in Hegel’s frame of mind has been increasingly reflected in academia. Some popular concepts such as reducing the heterogeneity of life and struggle into “dualistic” labor and capital, the struggle of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, and finally the settlement of such “good society” With “capital self-denial ” to achieve such concepts, it is “Hegel ghost ” appearance. When Italian Autocrat Hart and Negri riveted the causes of these problems to Hegelian dialectics, open-door Marxist representative John Holloway tried to intervene in this discussion with Adorno’s negative dialectics, and he analyzed The Hegelian dialectics is the political philosophical significance of our “tights ” and the deviation caused by the practice, and re-mentioned Adorno’s “non-identity ” and advocated from capital productivity to Social productivity of labor ", in order to seek the possibility of capitalism’s criticism and liberation.