论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨一次性根管治疗感染根管的临床效果。方法:选取本院2012年1月至2013年6月收治的100例感染根管患者为观察对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组患者接受传统多次法根管治疗术治疗,观察组患者接受一次性根管治疗,对比分析两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:观察组临床治疗后总治愈率与对照组相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而两组患者临床治疗后疼痛情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在感染根管患者的临床治疗中,一次性根管与传统多次根管治疗相比,效果较为相近,但因一次性根管治疗操作更加方便,因而临床应用价值更高。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of one-time root canal therapy on root canal infection. Methods: A total of 100 cases of infected root canal patients admitted from January 2012 to June 2013 in our hospital were selected as observation subjects and randomly divided into control group and observation group. Patients in control group received conventional root canal therapy , Observation group received one-time root canal therapy, comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical treatment. Results: The total cure rate in the observation group was not significantly different from that in the control group (P> 0.05). However, the pain scores in the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the clinical treatment of patients with root canal infection, one-time root canal therapy compared with the traditional multi-root canal treatment, the effect is similar, but more convenient because of the one-time root canal therapy, so the clinical application of higher value.