论文部分内容阅读
证据不足的无罪判决在性质上是一个价值判决,是对各种价值目标进行权衡后做出的理性选择。一旦作出并生效,证据不足的无罪判决就具有完全的判决效力。证据不足的无罪判决在特定情况下允许撤销,但是应当通过审判监督程序的方式进行。在我国目前的立法与司法解释中,与证据不足的无罪判决有关的规定还存在不少的问题,需要及时予以完善。
The guilty verdict, which is under-substantiated, is a value judgment in nature and a rational choice made after weighing various values. Once made and in force, a guilty verdict that is under-substantiated has full verdict. Unsubstantiated acquittal allows revocation under certain circumstances, but it should be done through trial supervision procedures. In the current legislative and judicial interpretation in our country, there are still many problems with the provisions on innocent judgments with insufficient evidence and need to be perfected in time.