A Review on Learners’ Factors in Language Learning

来源 :校园英语·上旬 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:stuber
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  【Abstracts】Based on the literature of learners’ individual factors available, this essay tries to present the systematic relation between factors that can be controlled and those cannot. And a further exploration is carried out to elaborate on the specific learners’ controllable factors such as learning strategies, attribution and learners’ anxiety.
  【Key words】learners’ factors; language learning; uncontrollable factors; controllable factors
  It is widely acknowledged that since mid 1970s in the last century, a shift has been seen in language learning from teachers to learners. One portion of the factors in the learning process, which is the interior individual learner factors, gradually, is getting into the perspective of language teachers and linguists. Along with the shift, researches of various directions are springing up.
  1. Learners’ Uncontrollable Factors
  Learners factors, based on the feature of them, can be classified into two main categories: controllable factors and uncontrollable factors by Wen Qiufang, one of the currently leading researchers in foreign language teaching and learning in China.(Wen, 1993) Those factors coming with the learners from the time they are born or during the long procedure of their growth that stay beyond the effect of the learners’ subjective efforts in the certain research time, are considered uncontrollable, such as family background, educational accumulation, previous work experience, physical health, height, learning aptitude, etc. The purpose of scientific research in language learning is definitely to shed some lights on the possible methods in order to improve teaching and learning both from teachers and students’ sides. Its emphasis, therefore, usually is removed from the uncontrollable factors.
  2. Learners’ Controllable Factors
  Those factors that are changeable or improvable through the systematic training of a learner with the positive goal of enhancing his or her leaning efficacy in certain technique are called controllable factors. Among the substantial body of research focusing on controllable factors in language learning, learners’ individual factors are explored not only from the perspective of language learning in the general sense(蘇红蕾, 王秋红, 2008: 102-112), but also in specific practice of language learning skills(易冬凤, 2004). To name a few, they are learners’ learning styles, learning strategies, motivation, beliefs, learner anxiety, etc.
  2.1 Learning styles   Learning styles refer to a range of competing and contested theories that aim to account for differences in individuals’ learning. A learner’s learning style is his or her natural, habitual and preferred way of absorbing, processing and retaining new information and skills (Reid 1995). There are many different learning styles models and only a few models are described below.
  Visual (spatial): Visual learners prefer seeing (using pictures, images, and spatial understanding). They convert words into images in the brain.
  Aural (auditory-musical): Aural learners prefer listening (using sound and music, etc.).
  Verbal (linguistic): Verbal learners prefer using words, both in speech and writing.
  Tactile (kinesthetic): Tactile learners prefer learning via experience (using their body, hands and sense of touch).
  Logical (mathematical): Logical learners prefer using logic, reasoning and systems.
  Social (interpersonal): Social learners prefer to learn in groups or with other people.
  Solitary (intrapersonal): Solitary learners prefer to work alone and use self-study.
  2.2 Learning Strategies
  There is a considerable debate on appropriate ways of defining learning strategies. Researchers have not gained a common understanding of learning strategies. Some definitions of learning strategies proposed by different researchers are as follows: Chamot(1987): Learning strategies are techniques, approaches or deliberate actions that students take in order to facilitate their learning. Rubin(1987): Learning strategies are strategies which contribute to the development of the language system which the learner constructs and affect learning directly. Oxford(1989): Language learning strategies are behaviors or actions which learners use to make language learning more successful, self-directed and enjoyable.
  A complete definition of learning strategies is not available. However, the definitions above show that no researchers define language learning strategies in exactly the same way. All these definitions provide insights into understanding the process of learning a language. It is not surprising that till now, no consensus have yet arrived on the definition of strategy. But, the list of definitions of language learning strategies taken from the literature reveals a number of controversial issues(Ellis, 1994). The understanding of the definition of language learning strategies is directly related to the classification on them.   Sometimes the definitions are the yardsticks of the classifications or, taxonomy, and also the basic foundations for strategy study. And according to Wen Qiufang(1993), strategies include environmental factors (such as cultural background, learning conditions, teaching environment, learning task) and learners’ own factors (such as learning motivation, effort, learning style and gender) related to the learning strategies. Rebecca Oxford’s (1990) research tries to draw a distinction between direct strategies and indirect strategies in learning.
  2.3 Learners’ Anxiety
  Anxiety is another crucial factor related to English learning. Spielberger(1972) defines anxiety as “an unpleasant emotional state or condition, which is characterized by subjective feelings of tension, apprehension, and worry, and by activation or arousal of the automatic nervous system”. And most of researchers followed this definition. Language anxiety is described as fear or apprehension occurring when a learner is expected to perform in the second or foreign language(Garder and MacIntyre, 1993). Three components of foreign language anxiety have been identified (Horwitzetal, 1986). A. Communication apprehension, arising from learner’s ability to adequately express mature thoughts and ideas; B. Fear of negative social evaluation, arising from a learner’s need to make a positive social impression on others; C. Test anxiety, or apprehension over academic evaluation.
  3. Implication
  It is believed that many factors affect language learning, among which, learners’ learning styles, strategies and their anxiety have been found to be the main influential ones in determining the final success of language learning. Though there is no particular method that can suit the needs of all learners, teachers can take learners’ learning styles, strategies, and anxiety into account to help learners broaden their repertoire of learning and thus develop more flexibility and create greater possibility of success in their language learning.
  References:
  [1]Chamot,A.Learner Strategies in Language Learning[C].Prentice Hall,1987.
  [2]Ellis,R.The Study of Second Language Acquisition[M].London:Oxford University Press,1994.
  [3]Heider,F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations[M].New York:Wiley,1958.
  [4]Horwitz,E.and J.Cope.Foreign language Classroom Anxiety[J].Modern Language Journal,1986:125-132.
  [5]Kelley,H.H.Attribution in Social Psychology[J].Nebraska Symposium on Motivation,1967(15)1967:192-238.   [6]MacIntyre,P.and R.Gardner.The Subtle Effects of Language Anxiety on Cognitive Processing in the Second Language[J].Language Learning,1993:283-305.
  [7]O’Mally,J.M.and Chamot A.U.Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisitions[M].Cambridge University Press,1990:44.
  [8]Oxford,R.Use of Language Learning Strategies:A Synthesis of Studies with Implications for Teacher Training[C].System 17,1989:235-247.
  [9]Rebecca,Oxford.Language Learning Strategies[M].Heinle Publishers,Boston,1990.
  [10]Spielberger,D.Anxiety:Current Trends in Theory and Research[M].New York:Academic Press,1972.
  [11]Stephen,W.Littlejohn.Theories Human Communication[M].清華大学出版社,2003:378.
  [12]Weiner,B.Theories of Motivation[M].Chicago:Rand MeNally,1972.
  [13]Weiner,B.Cognitive Views of Human Motivation[M].New York:Academic Press,1974.
  [14]Wen Qiufang.The Releationship of Modifiable Learner Variables to Learning Outcomes[M].Hong Kong University,1993.
  [15]Coffield,Frank;Moseley,David;Hall,Elaine;Ecclestone,Kathryn.Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning:a systematic and critical review(PDF,2004
  [16]苏红蕾,王秋红.A Survey of Senior Middle School Students’ Attribution Inclination in English Learning[J].宁波教育学院学报,2008(03):102-112.
其他文献
自引入中国以来,上市公司股票期权激励计划就得到了广泛关注,许多专家学者对股票期权激励计划褒贬不一。本文通过对股票期权激励计划的利弊分析,指出股票期权激励计划具有降低委
温家宝总理在全国金融工作会议强调指出,继续深化国有银行改革,关键是继续完善公司治理结构。国有银行构成了我国银行业的主体,是我国金融业的核心与主导力量,在我国经济和社会发
2016年4月14日正值傣历新年,在西双版纳州举行了“首届象脚鼓舞及民族文化大展演”,由来自全州各个地区和民族的五千余名群众参加,他们身着节日盛装,列成浩浩荡荡的八个方阵,
期刊
高速和重载轨道牵引机车在运行过程中的受力强度和复杂程度较从前高出许多,各类部件的焊接质量对整车系统可靠性及行车安全影响更为重大。株洲联诚集团作为国内轨道牵引装备产业链的重要成员,必须建立科学完善的焊接管理体系,确保持续稳定的产品质量。论文首先介绍了国际先进的焊接管理标准体系,以及其在欧洲轨道牵引设备制造企业的运用情况,然后分析了株洲联诚集团产品实物质量状况和焊接管理的问题现状。根据现行焊接管理过程
市场中的企业是各种生产要素的组合,要素的稀缺性决定了要素投入方拥有企业剩余权益的索取权。知识经济的到来,知识成为了最稀缺的生产要素,而人力资本作为先进知识的载体,必将超
目的 分析新型冠状病毒患者血液中各指标特点,为临床诊治提供理论依据.方法 以明确诊断为新型冠状病毒肺炎的不同临床分型的78例患者为研究对象,分析其外周血白细胞、血清生
在21世纪,电信企业的经营理念将发生根本转变,电信企业将从主要依靠语音业务获取收入,转向靠为客户提供优质电信服务获取效益。电信企业将不再单纯地追求外延扩张,而是更加重视和依靠现代通信技术。但积极依靠通信技术发展是不够的,通信技术创新是手段,营销创新才是目标。本研究以湖南电信大客户营销为主体,以创造并扩大客户价值为核心,提出一系列的电信大客户营销策略,并对湖南电信大客户营销工作中的成功经验进行总结分
在知识管理中,集成和应用组织知识的能力是企业创造和维持竞争优势的关键。这主要是因为如果知识不能够被集成和共享,那么它对于实现组织目标来说价值就极其有限。因此,知识