论文部分内容阅读
1995年至1996年初,美国共和党人控制的第104届国会与民主党人总统克林顿,围绕制定1996年预算彼此开战,交火将近一年。这场预算之战空前激烈、深刻地展演了分权制下。信奉不同政策的国会与总统相互操戈制衡可达到的极限状态。1995年爆发预算大战至少有两大原因。一是制度性的,即美国宪法所规定的宪政制度;另一个是政治性的,即美国两大党各奉一套政纲而互相斗争。综观当代各发达国家,象美国1995年国会与总统之间的预算斗争,在其他发达国家断难出现,这主要是因为,其他发达国家没有一个奉行美国那样彻底的分权制,它们的议会不具备美国国会所享有的那些权力,不可能象美国国会那样自主制定预算。
From 1995 to early 1996, Clinton, the 104th Congressional and Democrat President controlled by Republicans in the United States, battled each other for the 1996 budgetary preparations for nearly a year. The war on budget was unprecedentedly intense and under the decentralization. The limit state that the parliaments and presidents that embrace different policies can control each other’s checks and balances. Budget wars broke out in 1995 for at least two reasons. One is institutionalization, that is, the constitutional system stipulated in the U.S. constitution; the other is political, that is, the two major parties in the United States struggle with each other on a set platform. Looking at all the contemporary developed countries like the 1995 budgetary battles between the United States and the president in the United States have been hard to come by in other developed countries. This is mainly because none of the other developed countries have pursued a completely decentralized system like the United States, and their parliaments With those powers enjoyed by the United States Congress, it is impossible to formulate a budget autonomously as the United States Congress does.