论文部分内容阅读
我们认为,在以微信为代表的OTT业务上,用户最基本的利益是:技术越进步,带宽应更宽,价格应更低。没有倒过来的:技术越进步,越要多收费。民众尽管大多听不懂什么叫信令,但心里根本上憋屈的是这个。这里要考虑一个特别的背景:据国际电联报告,中国宽带与世界的距离正在拉大。信令问题属于基础设施问题。既然OTT业务大量占用信令到成了问题的程度,说明基础设施不足了。谁负责基础设施投入呢?当然是运营商。如果运营商只是说,我在信令上付出的成本,不能抵消流
We believe that in the OTT business represented by WeChat, the most basic user benefits are: the more advanced the technology, the wider the bandwidth and the lower the price. Not upside down: The more advanced the technology, the more it charges. Although most people do not understand what is called signaling, but the heart is basically Biequ this. Here’s a special background to consider: According to ITU, the distance between China’s broadband and the world is widening. The signaling problem is an infrastructure problem. Since OTT services occupy a large amount of signaling to the extent of the problem, indicating inadequate infrastructure. Who is responsible for infrastructure investment? Of course, operators. If the operator just said that I paid the cost of signaling, can not offset the flow